MIT 18.S096 Topics in Mathematics with Applications in Finance, Fall 2013 ดูหลักสูตรทั้งหมด: ผู้สอน: Peter Kempthorne, Choongbum Lee, Vasily Strela, Jake Xia ในการบรรยายครั้งแรกของหลักสูตรนี้ ผู้สอนจะแนะนำคำศัพท์และแนวคิดหลักที่เกี่ยวข้องกับการเงิน . ผลิตภัณฑ์ ตลาด และการวิเคราะห์เชิงปริมาณ ใบอนุญาต: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA ข้อมูลเพิ่มเติมได้ที่ คอร์สอื่นๆ ที่ .
Table of Contents
Images related to the topic finance 101 lecture
Search related to the topic 1. Introduction, Financial Terms and Concepts
#Introduction #Financial #Terms #Concepts
1. Introduction, Financial Terms and Concepts
finance 101 lecture
คุณสามารถค้นหาข้อมูลที่เป็นประโยชน์เพิ่มเติมได้ที่นี่: ดูเพิ่มเติมที่นี่
คุณสามารถค้นหาข้อมูลที่เป็นประโยชน์เพิ่มเติมได้ที่นี่: ดูเพิ่มเติมที่นี่
does ‘stock’ mean: to represent #of products in storage and measured quantities of a resource extracted?
And if someone thinks a company has a great product and the company thinks it might need extra cash to accomplish more production, that is when the investor begins to be rewarded with a percentage of the value of the next products sold?
Thank you MIT
Im not interested about this, but I'm Interestingly watching & learning, wt* !!!
He mention the government sets interest rates, but doesn’t the federal reserve set interest rates ?
nice
I was able to grow my portfolio from $2k to $16k within two weeks through Bitcoin trading!! It really feels like I've won the world cup finals 🍾 💃
Isn’t this the guy that Batman kidnapped in The Dark Knight?
44:08
It's always the first lecture that I can still keep up with.. the next I'm dead
Thank you
Shoutout to my ape brothers working hard to get more wrinkles 🚀🌕
CDO of a CDO … CDO squared!
Where wheeler should!!!Plese in Rushing language!!!
i can finally tell people that i attended MIT in the fall of 2021
amazing 😍😍
The natural tendency for most is to just let their trades run against them, but when they take profits they take a few bucks and run.
Financial markets are a minus sum game, sir
"aaaand ah"
Is the Federal Reserve sustainable?
1996-2008: GDP ↑45%, Monetary Base ↑46%
2008-2020: GDP ↑32%, Monetary Base ↑600%
Prior to 2008, the Monetary Base and the GDP were 98% correlated reflecting the reciprocal relationship of money and economic expansion.
Can the current rate of monetary expansion without corresponding GDP growth continue without consequence?
*Bloomberg sued The Federal Reserve in 2011 and uncovered a $7.7T secret bank bailout not represented here.
God my professors suck
What's the next video in this series?